Design and development of a semi-automatic broomstick-making machine of fresh and dried coconut leaves with rachis dual cutter and dust collector/ Kenjie A. Valencia, Lalaine C. Lacambra, John Hyskao R. Nati, Theresa Anjelica Danielle B. Rafols, and Marie Andrea C. Rodriguez.--
Material type:
TextPublication details: Manila: Technological University of the Philippines, 2025.Description: x, 102pages: 29cmContent type: - BTH TJ 145 V35 2025
| Item type | Current library | Shelving location | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bachelor's Thesis COE
|
TUP Manila Library | Thesis Section-2nd floor | BTH TJ 145 V35 2025 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | c.1 | Not for loan | BTH0006428 |
Bachelor's thesis
College Of Engineering.--
Bachelor of science in mechanical engineering: Technological University of the Philippines,
2025.
Includes bibliographic references and index.
The Philippines, as the second-largest producer of coconut products, utilizes every
part of the coconut plant for sustainable industrial use. One such application is the
production of broomsticks from coconut leaves by extracting the midribs. This study
developed a semi-automatic coconut broomstick-making machine to improve production
efficiency and reduce the limitations of manual labor. The machine features a dual cutter,
rubber rollers (in place of abrasives), feeder guide, dust collector, and chain and gear
transmission systems. The machine was evaluated using fresh and dried coconut leaves to
measure production rate, de-leafing efficiency, and dust collection effectiveness. It
processed 15 fresh leaflets per minute with 68.89% peeling efficiency and 18.67 dried
leaflets per minute with a lower 51.79% efficiency. Dust collection was effective at
83.97%, though minor leakage was noted. The machine showed stable performance at
batch level, de-leafing around 23 of 30 leaflets per cycle, though it fell short of the target
rates of 20 fresh and 25 dried midribs per minute due to feeder and roller limitations.
Compared to reference machines, the prototype showed similar or better feeding efficiency
but lower de-leafing success, particularly against De Vicente et al.’s model. However, it
remains a safer and faster alternative to manual processing. Economic analysis showed
strong viability, with profit margins exceeding 38% and a payback period under 212 days.
Recommended improvements include adjusting brush clearance, sealing dust chamber
gaps, integrating a scraper to prevent jams, and widening feeder slots to enhance
throughput and reliability.
There are no comments on this title.