Duay, Charles Lemuel C.  <br/><br/>
Development Of Progressive Die Using Augmented Reality Technology As Instructional Material/ 
Charles Lemuel C. Duay, Patricia Ann E. Escutin, John Sylvester U. Macabuag, Deanne Jeremiah C. Ordoñez and Tristan Sarmiento.-- 
 -  Technological University of the Philippines, Manila.  March 2019 
 - xii, 116 pages.  29 cm 
<br/><br/> Bachelor's thesis 
<br/><br/>College of Industrial Technology.-- 
<br/><br/>Includes bibliographic references and index. 
<br/><br/> Learning is a complex process, it takes time and effort for someone to understand fully a<br/>single module and it also depends on his learning comprehension level. Though learning<br/>is a fun and enjoyable process of a life a human being, sometimes it can be refined by<br/>using instructional materials such as visual aids, videos, manual, textbooks and<br/>PowerPoint presentations. To solve the problem of giving such a huge amount of time of<br/>understanding a module, augmented die reality was conceptualized and develop to ease<br/>the burden of students on how they are going to understand how a progressive die works.<br/>It will improve and enhance their capability on understanding what is the purpose and<br/>significance of this study. With the use of actual progressive die as instructional material,<br/>it was created to become a basis of our projection of 3D view of parts and functions of<br/>progressive die using augmented reality technology. Test results shows that the students<br/>prefer the application rather than traditional way of learning of the die course. It was<br/>conducted on students who are taking the die course. The hardware was evaluated using<br/>the criteria of functionality, workability, durability, safety, aesthetics and economy. The<br/>results of the evaluation of the hardware with an overall mean of 4.49 with a descriptive<br/>rating of “Very acceptable” On the other hand, software was evaluated to determine its<br/>acceptability in terms of function sustainability, performance efficiency, compatibility,<br/>usability, reliability, security, maintainability and portability. The evaluators are<br/>composed of five professionals and twenty five students. Based on the results, it obtains<br/>an overall mean of 4.57, which has an equivalent descriptive rating of “Highly<br/>Acceptable.” The application runs smoothly on any android device using different<br/>version of android. This proves that the mobile application improves the comprehension<br/>level and understanding of students. 
<br/><br/><label>Subjects--Topical Terms: </label><br/>Tool and Die Engineering Technology<br/>Augmented Reality Technology
<br/><br/><label>LC Class. No.: </label>BTH TN 730  / D83 2019