000			03418nam a22003497a 4500
003			OSt
005			20250307142916.0
008			250307b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aTUPM _bEnglish _cTUPM _dTUPM _erda
050			_aBTH TK 146 _bC37 2025
100			_aCapistrano, Mary Jane L. _eauthor
245			_aDevelopment of mechatronics training board for hands-on learning/ _cMary Jane L. Capistrano, Jessalyn L. Leobit, Roselin R. Mascardo, Jessica Peñano, Khatlyn Joy A. Soleto, and Jenalen S. Tanteo .--
260			_aManila: _bTechnological University of the Philippines, _c2025.
300			_axi, 133pages: _c29cm.
336			_2rdacontent
337			_2rdamedia
338			_2rdacarrier
500			_aBachelor's thesis
502			_aCollege of Industrial Technology .-- _bBachelor of Technology major in Electrical Engineering Technology: _cTechnological University of the Philippines, _d2025.
504			_aIncludes bibliographic references and index.
520			_aStudents get a deeper comprehension of the course material while using the Mechatronics Training Board to demonstrate concepts and evaluate student performance in the lab. The Mechatronics Training Board helps students grasp the course content better and use it to explain concepts and assess students’ learning. This makes it easier for the user to handle the challenging wiring simulation and improve their critical thinking. The material used for the construction of the training device which is the prototype’s side covering is 822 x 604mm plywood. The design of the prototype is portable and easily transportable. It is applied in performing the experiment as prescribed and is used to house motor control, PLC, and electro-pneumatic components. The prototype is developed with locally available resources. The potential users then tested the feasibility and usability of the prototype and conducted an evaluation of the prototype. Fifty people were examined including four (4) academic members, one (1) professional, twenty-nine (29) electrical students, and fifteen (15) electronics students from the Technological University of the Philippines. The result of the Technological University of the Philippines, College of Industrial Technology Evaluation Instrument is 4.59 and the descriptive mean is “Highly Acceptable”. The usability and effectiveness of the prototype have made it a very useful tool in improving students’ learning achievements and encouraging them to be more practical in their mechatronics education. Furthermore, mechatronics research and innovation have been improved by the prototype's design and development, and there is a good likelihood that educational institutions will adopt it broadly. Overall, the Mechatronics Training Board prototype has demonstrated potential for furthering mechatronics education and research. Keywords: Mechatronics Training Board, Mechatronics Hands-On Learning, Electrical Training, Training Table.
650			_aElectrical engineering technology
650			_aElectrical training
650			_aMechatronics
700			_aCapistrano, Mary Jane L. _eauthor
700			_aLeobit, Jessalyn L. _eauthor
700			_aMascardo, Roselin R. _eauthor
700			_aPeñano, Jessica _eauthor
700			_aSoleto, Khatlyn Joy A. _eauthor
700			_aTanteo, Jenalen S. _eauthor
942			_2lcc _cBTH CIT _n0
999			_c29458 _d29458