000 02684nam a22003137a 4500
003 OSt
005 20250403103545.0
008 250403b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aTUPM
_bEnglish
_cTUPM
_dTUPM
_erda
050 _aBTH TN 730
_bA44 2023
100 _aAlfaras, Jorge Clark C.
_eauthor
245 _aDevelopment of Motorized Eraser as Whiteboard Attachment
_cJorge Clark C. Alfaras, John Vincent D. Gaspar, Neil Andrei M. Palad and Steven Kyle G. Sotto
260 _aManila:
_bTechnological University of the Philippines
_c2023.
300 _aix 67pages
_c29cm.
336 _2rdacontent
337 _2rdamedia
338 _2rdacarrier
500 _aBachelor's thesis
502 _aCollege of Industrial Technology.--
_bBachelor of Engineering Technology major in Mechanical Technology Option in Dies and Moulds Technology
_cTechnological University of the Philippines
_d2023.
504 _aIncludes bibliographic references and index.
520 _aThe Development of Motorized Eraser as Whiteboard Attachment aimed to design and build a Motorized Eraser as a Whiteboard Attachment that could be used everywhere teaching takes place. It is portable, height-adjustable, attachable and removable from a specified 8 by 4 foot Whiteboard. It is made up of many essential components, including a steel tubular square bar that serves as the frame, a flat bar with three feetof Eraser and detachable fiber clothing that serves as the eraser, a limit switch for both ends, a Dc motor with 40 RPM, and a 12-volt battery for power supply, with a backup battery. The rubber belt is used to synchronize the Whiteboard Attachment Mechanism with the movement of the bearing. For safety, the panel box has a primaryswitch, a toggle switch, and a power male female connector. The prototype was evaluated by 20 students and professors. The portable eraser for whiteboard is intended to improve processing speed, accuracy, safety, dependability, aesthetics, and economies. It cuts down on the time spent manually erasing whiteboard marks. It's also portable, so you may move it from one spot to another. The prototype, however, does not erase all of the whiteboard markings. According to the evaluation's numerical results, each respondent rates the utility, beauty, workability, durability, economy, and, finally, safety. They offer us a rating ranging from 1.00 to 5.00, with an average mean of 4.50.
650 _2Mechanical Technology
650 _2Motorized Eraser
650 _2rubber belt
700 _aGaspar, John Vincent D.
_eauthor
700 _aPalad, Neil Andrei M.
_eauthor
700 _aSotto, Steven Kyle G.
_eauthor
942 _2lcc
_cBTH CIT
_n0
999 _c29633
_d29633