000 02831nam a22003137a 4500
003 OSt
005 20250702180000.0
008 250702b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aTUPM
_bEnglish
_cTUPM
_dTUPM
_erda
050 _aBTH TS 870
_bD46 2019
100 _aDe Ocampo, Marinnele E.
_eauthor
245 _aEffects of pineapple leaves fiber as reinforcement to royal poinciana pod-isocyanate board/
_cMarinnele E. De Ocampo, Tyra Marianne S. Martin, Kenlyn P. Palay, and Althea Michelle T. Romasanta.--
260 _aManila:
_bTechnological University of the Philippines,
_c2019.
300 _aix, 74pages:
_c29cm.
336 _2rdacontent
337 _2rdamedia
338 _2rdacarrier
500 _aBachelor's thesis
502 _aCollege of Industrial Technology.--
_bBachelor of technology major in civil engineering technology:
_cTechnological University of the Philippines,
_d2019.
504 _aIncludes bibliographic references and index.
520 _aThe study, Effects of Pineapple Leaves Fiber as Reinforcement to Royal Poinciana Pod- Isocyanate Board, aims to improve the physical and mechanical test results of the previous research, Development of Royal Poinciana Pod-Isocyanate Board, while utilizing pineapple leaves wastes as reinforcement. The last study failed to meet PNS Specification for type 150 on Water Absorption, Thickness Swelling, Modulus of Rupture, Face Screw Holding Test and Internal Bond Test. The mix designs of this study are basing from the two (2) mix designs that had the best results of the previous research, 97:3 and 95:5, and reinforcing both designs with 5%, 10% and 15% of Pineapple Leaves Fiber. The project underwent significant processes such as raw material collection, fiber extraction, drying, shredding, sieving, mixing, molding, hot pressing, curing, testing and evaluation to determine the acceptability of the board. Based on the physical test results, only one mix design met the PNS for Water Absorption which is 27.82% while its Thickness Swelling is 21.55% which did not pass the PNS as well as all the other mix designs. For mechanical test results, none from the mix designs met the PNS for Modulus of Rupture while all mix designs met the PNS for Face Screw Holding Test and Internal Bond Test with best results of 77.12kg/cm2 and 8.33kg/cm2 accordingly. With an average mean of 4.19 from 30 respondents, the project was rated descriptively as “Very Acceptable.” Overall, the results from all mix designs showed improvement compared to the previous study.
650 _aLeaf composite
650 _aEco composite
650 _aFiber reinforcement
700 _aMartin, Tyra Marianne S.
_eauthor
700 _a Palay, Kenlyn P.
_eauthor
700 _aRomasanta, Althea Michelle T.
_eauthor
942 _2lcc
_cBTH CIT
_n0
999 _c30074
_d30074