000 02728nam a22003257a 4500
003 OSt
005 20250711162433.0
008 250710b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aTUPM
_bEnglish
_cTUPM
_dTUPM
_erda
050 _aBTH TP 949
_bA84 2025
100 _aAtenta, James Louie M.
_eauthor
245 _aDevelopment of a portable semi-automatic curing machine for print production/
_cJames Louie M. Atenta, John Ezekiel D. Base, Ma. Beatrez R. Bumalay, Joseph C. Hilario III, and Mark Anthony C. Madelo.--
260 _aManila:
_bTechnological University of the Philippines,
_c2025.
300 _axii, 97pages:
_c29cm.
336 _2rdacontent
337 _2rdamedia
338 _2rdacarrier
500 _aBachelor's thesis
502 _aCollege of Industrial Technology.--
_bBachelor of technology major in print media technology:
_cTechnological University of the Philippines,
_d2025.
504 _aIncludes bibliographic references and index.
520 _aThis study aimed to objectively test the development of a portable semi-automatic curing machine for print production and evaluate its performance for functionality, workability, durability, safety, aesthetics, and economy. The prototype was tested by measuring the recommended settings for temperature, distance of the chamber, and the speed of the conveyor belt; all contributing to the curing and drying quality of the material. The prototype was evaluated by conducting a survey, which was composed of thirty (30) participants that consists of twenty (20) Print Media Technology students, five (5) Graphic Arts and Printing Technology professors, and five (5) individuals working in the printing industry. The tests showed that the prototype can achieve a completely dry and transfer proof print with the set temperature of 130°C, distance of 14cm, and a conveyor speed of 1 (0.5mm/sec) with textile ink. For rubberized ink, it could achieve the same results with the set temperature of 140°C, distance of 14cm and conveyor speed of 1 (0.5mm/sec). It had trouble achieving the same results when tested with plastisol ink, resulting in a longer drying time of 14 min & 30 sec with the set temperature of 150°C and distance of 14cm. The researchers’ tested the pressed prints with UV light curing and it shows no signs of tearing breaks and bumps. The evaluation results revealed that it achieved a grand mean of 4.83 with
650 _aUv-curing
650 _aInk drying
650 _aConveyor curing machine
700 _aBase, John Ezekiel D.
_eauthor
700 _aBumalay, Ma. Beatrez R.
_eauthor
700 _aHilario III, Joseph C.
_eauthor
700 _aMadelo, Mark Anthony C.
_eauthor
942 _2lcc
_cBTH CIT
_n0
999 _c30266
_d30266