000 03044nam a22003257a 4500
003 OSt
005 20250718151604.0
008 250718b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aTUPM
_bEnglish
_cTUPM
_dTUPM
_erda
050 _aBTH TJ 145
_bV35 2025
100 _aValencia, Kenjie A.
_eauthor
245 _aDesign and development of a semi-automatic broomstick-making machine of fresh and dried coconut leaves with rachis dual cutter and dust collector/
_cKenjie A. Valencia, Lalaine C. Lacambra, John Hyskao R. Nati, Theresa Anjelica Danielle B. Rafols, and Marie Andrea C. Rodriguez.--
260 _aManila:
_bTechnological University of the Philippines,
_c2025.
300 _ax, 102pages:
_c29cm.
336 _2rdacontent
337 _2rdamedia
338 _2rdacarrier
500 _aBachelor's thesis
502 _aCollege Of Engineering.--
_bBachelor of science in mechanical engineering:
_cTechnological University of the Philippines,
_d2025.
504 _aIncludes bibliographic references and index.
520 _aThe Philippines, as the second-largest producer of coconut products, utilizes every part of the coconut plant for sustainable industrial use. One such application is the production of broomsticks from coconut leaves by extracting the midribs. This study developed a semi-automatic coconut broomstick-making machine to improve production efficiency and reduce the limitations of manual labor. The machine features a dual cutter, rubber rollers (in place of abrasives), feeder guide, dust collector, and chain and gear transmission systems. The machine was evaluated using fresh and dried coconut leaves to measure production rate, de-leafing efficiency, and dust collection effectiveness. It processed 15 fresh leaflets per minute with 68.89% peeling efficiency and 18.67 dried leaflets per minute with a lower 51.79% efficiency. Dust collection was effective at 83.97%, though minor leakage was noted. The machine showed stable performance at batch level, de-leafing around 23 of 30 leaflets per cycle, though it fell short of the target rates of 20 fresh and 25 dried midribs per minute due to feeder and roller limitations. Compared to reference machines, the prototype showed similar or better feeding efficiency but lower de-leafing success, particularly against De Vicente et al.’s model. However, it remains a safer and faster alternative to manual processing. Economic analysis showed strong viability, with profit margins exceeding 38% and a payback period under 212 days. Recommended improvements include adjusting brush clearance, sealing dust chamber gaps, integrating a scraper to prevent jams, and widening feeder slots to enhance throughput and reliability.
650 _aCoconut leaflets
650 _aCoconut broomstick
650 _aCoconut midribs
700 _aLacambra, Lalaine C.
_eauthor
700 _aLacambra, Lalaine C.
_eauthor
700 _aLacambra, Lalaine C.
_eauthor
700 _aRodriguez, Marie Andrea C.
_eauthor
942 _2lcc
_cBTH COE
_n0
999 _c30468
_d30468