000			03456nam a22003377a 4500
003			OSt
005			20260311154639.0
008			260311b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aTUPM _bEnglish _cTUPM _dTUPM _erda
050			_aBTH TX 911.3 _bA43 2025
100			_aAmador, Mariane Nicole Y. _eauthor
245			_aRelationship between AI tool usage and academic performance of ESM students at TUP Manila/ _cMarianne Nicole Y. Amador, Sophia Mhae M. Gambol, Cookie Mae J. Hernandez, Erika Mae E. Libertad, and Zainab L. Sarail ,--
260			_aManila: _bTechnological University of the Philippines, _c2025.
300			_ax, 122pages: _c29cm.
336			_2rdacontent
337			_2rdamedia
338			_2rdacarrier
500			_aBachelor's thesis
502			_aCollege of Industrial Education.-- _bBachelor of Technical Vocational Techer Education major in Food and Service Management: _cTechnological University of the Philippines, _d2025.
504			_aIncludes bibliographic references and index.
520			_aThis study is about the students of Food Service Management (FSM) at the Technological University of the Philippines Manila Campus during their second term of academic year and the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools on their Academic Performance, titled " Relationship between AI Tool Usage and Academic Performance of FSM Students at TUP Manila". This study is a descriptive-quantitative, and cross-sectional design was employed, it involves 50 FSM students selected through random sampling. Data was gathered using structured questionnaire adapted from Bancoro (2024) which measured its relationship with three categories of AI tool usage (functionality availability and complexity) and three categories of academic performance (assessment scores course mastery and grading metrics) on a five-point Likert scale. This reflected excellent internal consistency. It was found that the usage of AI tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, Quillbot, and Canva for functionality had a mean of 3.23 and for complexity, it had a mean of 3.12. However, their use even though available options had a mean of 3.52. This implies that despite the availability of the AI tools they only need to be used for simple tasks. However, their academic ability was ranked highly by the respondents, with their achievement level categorized as Above Average at 3.72 and grading standards in the Excellent category, given that the overall mean was 4.32. The graphs indicated that higher usage of AI did not result in a correlation with higher grades, thereby suggesting that these AI applications were simply supplements and aid in convenience and efficiency rather than primary learning tools. FSM academic success in TUPManila continues to rely on familiar concepts in study habits and hands-on training, and FSM academic subjects need an incorporation of concepts in using AI effectively. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence Tools, Academic Performance, Food Service Management Students, AI Tool Usage, Higher Education.
650			_aTechnical vocational teacher education
650			_aFood and service management
650			_aFood and beverages
650			_aArtificial intelligence _vacademic application
700			_aGambol, Sophia Mhae M. _eauthor
700			_aHernandez, Cookie Mae J. _eauthor
700			_aLibertad, Erika Mae E. _eauthor
700			_aSarail, Zainab L. _eauthor
942			_2lcc _cBTH CIE _n0
999			_c31338 _d31338